Is it time for a leadership change in the PFF?

Unlike in previous tournaments or qualifiers, our men’s team in the AFF Mitsubishi Cup had one of the longest preparations since 2012, when the Azkals embarked on a two-country tour.

It was eight days a year ago, while for the latest AFF tournament, the pool was formed in November. The coach may have been announced late, but that didn’t mean preparations were not done.

BRIGHT SPOT. Sandro Reyes was one of the few reasons for Philippine football fans to be happy about in the Azkals’ dismal Mitsubishi Cup stint.

Still, it didn’t change a thing and we suffered another group stage exit and now there are talks of yet another coaching change. At this stage, it’s not worth learning the name of the coach if you’d have him for only three games or less.

Josep Ferre was what, the fourth Azkals coach is as many tournaments in two years? Scott Cooper in Suzuki Cup 2021, Stewart Hall in Singapore Tri-nations in March 2022, Thomas Dooley in Asian Cup qualifiers in June 2022, and finally, Ferre in the Mitsubishi Cup 2022. That’s not including Ernest Nierras’ spell as head coach during a couple of friendlies post Dooley Era 2.

If we can no longer afford a foreign coach for the long term, why not give the spot to a local? Besides, I’m pretty sure it’s the local staff that did the bulk of the preparations—checking player availability and status and communicating with the clubs.

Pre-2010, we used to have one-month camps, which were even criticized then as to short but the first two weeks of those camps were spent in getting out-of-shape players match-fit for the international game.

With our players coming from the PFL and leagues in Southeast Asia, they arrive at camp fit but the need to have more games together is made obvious during tournaments.

Then again, friendlies cost money, which the PFF no longer has for the men’s team. That’s why we have managers. In other countries, the coach is the manager; in the Philippines the manager is one who spends his own personal money for the team.

Nonong Araneta became the PFF president because malcontent at home then PFF head Mari Martinez gave up the semifinal hosting of the 2010 Suzuki Cup got him sacked.

Will Nonong suffer the same fate? Martinez was already an unpopular leader who only managed to avoid ouster by bribing…I mean by depositing P20,000 to FA president’s personal bank accounts as communication allowance.

Nonong, despite some discontent, remains a popular leader for football. An overstaying leader. He has won three terms but under the statutes adapted in 2015 that only allows PFF presidents to serve two consecutive terms, he has only won once and is eligible for reelection.

We will prepare the team better in the next cycle of World Cup and Asian Cup Qualifying. For now we will use the break to reassess and plan for the future.

Nonong Araneta to PDI, which added no further details were provided.

Should he run again? He is entitled to but as someone who harshly criticized Peping Cojuangco for overstaying and for bending the Philippine Olympic Committee rules in his favor, it would be hypocritical of me to support another Araneta candidacy. 

Unless, of course there’s no one else who would challenge him.

There are still so many things that need to be said or written about the PFF because of the latest fiasco, but unlike back in 2007, when I actively tried to lead the conversation in replacing Martinez as there was no active voice, there’s quite a few now in social media.

This time, it’s their voices that deserve to be heard.

Patience? We’ve been patient since 2014, the immediate Suzuki Cup that saw us lose in the semifinal after losing in the 2012 semifinal of the tournament we were tagged as title favorites.

Mike T. Limpag
Mike T. Limpag

Mike T. Limpag has covered the Cebu sports scene for over 20 years, starting as an 18-year-old cub reporter for the Freeman in 1997 before moving to SunStar Cebu in 2001.

One reply on “Is it time for a leadership change in the PFF?”

It’s easy to be an oppositionist. But to be a believable oppositionist there has to be substance to back up the opposition viewpoint.
Get rid of the president, the manager, the coach etc but who are the alternatives? If you replace someone then the replacement has to better than who is being replaced.
Is there a short list of suitable replacements or a clamouring of empty vessels making a lot of noise for the sake of making a noise?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *